What Moves Money Managers’ Portfolios? An Investigation of Preferences and Beliefs
نویسنده
چکیده
Asset allocation is widely recognized as the most fundamental decision in the investment process. Surprisingly little work has been done on examining what drives the asset allocation recommendations of professional investment advisors. To address this issue, we propose a general framework to identify and estimate the parameters characterizing the preferences and beliefs of money managers. In a mean-variance framework, we provide joint estimates of the preference parameters and the beliefs conditioned on observable information that most closely reproduce the dynamics of the observed portfolio recommendations made by a panel of international money managers for The Economist. Our findings suggest that money managers behave as low riskaverse investors and that heterogeneity in their conditional beliefs is key to explaining differences in their recommended portfolio allocations. The source of heterogeneity lies in the diverse interpretation of publicly available information. Using our general framework, we cannot reject the hypothesis that, in general, money managers use information efficiently. JEL Classification: G11; G14; G23.
منابع مشابه
Intelligent Techniques for R&D Project Selection in Large Social Organizations
Funding R&D projects is perhaps the most important task faced by large public organizations, in charge of promoting science and technology in different countries. However, most popular ways to solve this decision problem are based on too simple decision models and weak heuristics. In this paper a new methodology is presented to assist top level managers of those organizations during the project...
متن کاملPortfolio selection through imprecise Goal Programming model: Integration of the manager`s preferences
In the portfolio selection problem, the manager considers several objectives simultaneously such as the rate of return, the liquidity and the risk of portfolios. These objectives are conflicting and incommensurable. Moreover, the objectives can be imprecise. Generally, the portfolio manager seeks the best combination of the stocks that meets his investment objectives. The imprecise Goal Program...
متن کاملMonetary Reference Points of Managers: An Empirical Investigation of Status Quo Preferences and Social Comparisons
Monetary Reference Points of Managers: An Empirical Investigation of Status Quo Preferences and Social Comparisons We assemble two reference point based concepts of utility in our empirical study: the own previous status quo and social comparisons. We explore the relative relevance of these concepts for total compensation as well as for different parts of the compensation package of managers. M...
متن کاملIntelligent Techniques for R&D Project Selection in Large Social Organizations Técnicas Inteligentes para la Selección de Proyectos de I&D en las Grandes Organizaciones Públicas
Funding R&D projects is perhaps the most important task faced by large public organizations, in charge of promoting science and technology in different countries. However, most popular ways to solve this decision problem are based on too simple decision models and weak heuristics. In this paper a new methodology is presented to assist top level managers of those organizations during the project...
متن کاملWhistle Blowing: A Message to Leaders and Managers; Comment on “Cultures of Silence and Cultures of Voice: The Role of Whistleblowing in Healthcare Organizations”
This comment argues that instead of worrying about the pros and cons of whistleblowing one should focus on the more general problem of the failure of upward communication around safety and quality problems and consider what leaders and managers must do to stimulate subordinates to communicate and reward such communication. The article analyzes why safety failures occur and introduces the concep...
متن کامل